Resultados del registro nacional de pacientes diagnosticados de enfermedad inflamatoria intestinal candidatos a cirugía bariátrica (ReNacEIBar) / Results of the national registry of patients diagnosed with inflammatory bowel disease candidates for bariatric surgery (ReNacEIBar)

Introducción: El objetivo principal es realizar un Registro Nacional de pacientes diagnosticados de enfermedad inflamatoria intestinal (EII) que son sometidos a cirugía bariátrica, así como evaluar los resultados y aspectos fundamentales del manejo de este tipo de pacientes en la práctica clínica habitual. Metodología: Estudio retrospectivo observacional multicéntrico nacional, en el que se incluyen pacientes diagnosticados previamente de EII, que hayan sido intervenidos de cirugía bariátrica desde enero de 2000 hasta diciembre de 2022. Resultados: Se han incluido un total de 41 pacientes: 43,9% diagnosticados previamente de colitis ulcerosa (CU), 53,7% de enfermedad de Crohn (EC), y una colitis indeterminada (2,4%). El índice de masa corporal (IMC) preoperatorio ha sido de 45,8 ± 6,1 kg/m2. Se han realizado 31 (75,6%) gastrectomías verticales, un (2,4%) bypass gástrico y nueve (22%) bypass gástrico de una anastomosis. Se han registrado 9,8% de complicaciones. A los 12 meses, el IMC medio fue de 29,5 ± 4,7 kg/m2, presentando en un porcentaje de peso total perdido (%PTP) de 33,9 ± 9,1%. Conclusiones: La cirugía bariátrica en pacientes previamente diagnosticados de EII se puede considerar eficaz en cuanto a pérdida de peso, y segura en relación con un porcentaje bajo de complicaciones.(AU)

Background: Our aim is to carry out a national registry of patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) who underwent bariatric surgery, as well as evaluate the results and management of this type of patients in the usual clinical practice. Methods: National multicentric observational retrospective study, including patients, previously diagnosed with IBD who underwent bariatric surgery from January 2000 to December 2022. Results: Forty-one patients have been included: 43.9% previously diagnosed with ulcerative colitis, 57.3% Crohn's disease, and an indeterminate colitis (2.4%). The preoperative BMI was 45.8 ± 6.1 kg/m2. Among the bariatric surgeries, 31 (75.6%) sleeve gastrectomy, 1 (2.4%) gastric bypass and 9 (22%) one anastomosis gastric have been carried out. During the postoperative period, 9.8% complications have been recorded. BMI was 29.5 ± 4.7 kg/m2 and percent total weight lost was 33.9 ± 9.1% at 12 months. Conclusions: Bariatric surgery in patients with inflammatory bowel disease can be considered safe and effective.(AU)

Results of the national registry of patients diagnosed with inflammatory bowel disease candidates for bariatric surgery (ReNacEIBar).

BACKGROUND: Our aim is to carry out a national registry of patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) who underwent bariatric surgery, as well as evaluate the results and management of this type of patients in the usual clinical practice. METHODS: National multicentric observational retrospective study, including patients, previously diagnosed with IBD who underwent bariatric surgery from January 2000 to December 2022. RESULTS: Forty-one patients have been included: 43,9% previously diagnosed with ulcerative colitis, 57,3% Crohn's disease, and an indeterminate colitis (2,4%). The preoperative BMI was 45.8 ± 6,1 kg/m2. Among the bariatric surgeries, 31 (75,6%) sleeve gastrectomy, 1 (2,4%) gastric bypass and 9 (22%) one anastomosis gastric have been carried out. During the postoperative period, 9.8% complications have been recorded. BMI was 29,5 ± 4,7 kg/m2 and percent total weight lost was 33,9 ± 9,1% at 12 months. CONCLUSIONS: Bariatric surgery in patients with inflammatory bowel disease can be considered safe and effective.

Seeking an Initial-Weight-Independent Metric in a Mediterranean Cohort of Gastric Bypass Patients: the %AWL Revisited.

BACKGROUND: Most relative weight-loss metrics follow the formula "Weight loss(%) = 100 · (Initial BMI - Final BMI) / (Initial BMI-a)," where a is the reference point that defines the metric. The percentage of total weight loss (%TWL, a = 0) and percentage of excess weight loss (%EWL, a = 25) are influenced by a patient's initial weight. Recently, the percentage of alterable weight loss metric (%AWL, a = 13) has been reported to produce initial-weight-independent outcomes. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to replicate the methodology used for %AWL determination in a Mediterranean cohort of bariatric patients. SETTINGS: Multicenter study in 10 large hospitals in Spain. METHODS: Two large prospective databases were retrospectively searched for all primary laparoscopic gastric bypass patients with 2 years of follow-up. Outcomes at nadir were expressed and analyzed with 26 different metrics (a from 0 to 25), looking for the metric whose outcomes produced (1) the lowest coefficient of variation, (2) no differences between initially lighter and heavier patients, and (3) no correlation with patients' initial BMI. RESULTS: A cohort of 1793 patients was stratified into 4 gender-age groups: younger women (YW, n = 733), older women (OW, n = 674), younger men (YM, n = 197), and older men (OM, n = 189). The calculations suggested an optimal reference point of 18 kg/m2, defining a new metric (percentage of Mediterranean alterable weight loss, %MAWL). When %TWL, %EWL, %AWL, and %MAWL were tested on the whole sample, only %MAWL produced initial-weight-independent results. CONCLUSIONS: In our Mediterranean cohort of patients, a reference point of 18 (and not 13) yielded initial-weight-independent outcomes.

Obesidad y SARS-CoV-2: consideraciones sobre la cirugía bariátrica y recomendaciones para el inicio de la actividad quirúrgica / Obesity and SARS-CoV-2: Considerations on bariatric surgery and recommendations for the start of surgical activity

La pandemia SARS-CoV-2 ha tenido un gran impacto en todo el mundo, siendo España uno de los países más afectados. La demora en la cirugía bariátrica puede tener consecuencias fatales, ya que hasta el 50% de los pacientes que se encuentran en lista de espera desarrollan una nueva comorbilidad durante el tiempo que permanecen en ella y el 1,5% de pacientes fallecen mientras esperan la intervención. Es por ello por lo que la cirugía bariátrica no debe demorarse en cuanto la ocupación del hospital por pacientes COVID-19+ disminuya de forma significativa y se disponga de recursos y seguridad suficiente para realizar la cirugía en pacientes con patología benigna. Este documento recoge las principales recomendaciones para los programas de cirugía bariátrica en nuestro país desde el punto de vista tanto de seguridad como de preparación y seguimiento del paciente bariátrico en el contexto de la pandemia SARS-CoV-2

The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has a great impact worldwide, being Spain one of the most affected countries. The delay in bariatric surgery can have fatal consequences since up to 50% of the patients who are on the waiting list develop a new comorbidity during the time they remain on it and 1.5% of patients die while waiting for the intervention. That is why bariatric surgery should not be delayed, if the occupation of the hospital by COVID-19+ patients decreases significantly, and sufficient resources and safety are available to restart surgery in patients with benign pathology. This document contains the main recommendations for the bariatric surgery programs in our country from the point of view of safety, bariatric patient preparation and follow up during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemia

Obesity and SARS-CoV-2: Considerations on bariatric surgery and recommendations for the start of surgical activity. / Obesidad y SARS-CoV-2: consideraciones sobre la cirugía bariátrica y recomendaciones para el inicio de la actividad quirúrgica.

The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has a great impact worldwide, being Spain one of the most affected countries. The delay in bariatric surgery can have fatal consequences since up to 50% of the patients who are on the waiting list develop a new comorbidity during the time they remain on it and 1.5% of patients die while waiting for the intervention. That is why bariatric surgery should not be delayed, if the occupation of the hospital by COVID-19+ patients decreases significantly, and sufficient resources and safety are available to restart surgery in patients with benign pathology. This document contains the main recommendations for the bariatric surgery programs in our country from the point of view of safety, bariatric patient preparation and follow up during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemia.

Análisis de la pérdida ponderal a medio plazo después del bypass gastroyeyunal en Y de Roux y de la gastrectomía vertical: propuesta de gráficos de percentiles del porcentaje de peso total perdido para su uso en la práctica clínica diaria / Analysis of mid-term weight loss after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy: Proposed percentile charts for total weight loss percentages to be used in daily clinical practice

Introducción: El objetivo de este trabajo es analizar la evolución ponderal de las principales técnicas quirúrgicas bariátricas (bypass gastroyeyunal en Y de Roux [BPGY] y gastrectomía vertical [GV]) realizadas en un conjunto representativo de centros nacionales españoles, con el fin de confeccionar unos gráficos de percentiles del porcentaje de pérdida total de peso perdido durante los 3 primeros años después de la cirugía. Métodos: Se realiza un estudio de cohortes longitudinal retrospectivo a partir de los datos aportados por 9 centros hospitalarios españoles. Se han analizado los datos ponderales tanto en porcentaje de pérdida total de peso perdido como en porcentaje de exceso de peso perdido correspondientes al BPGY (n = 1.887) y a la GV (n = 1.210). Resultados: El BPGY sigue siendo la técnica más frecuentemente realizada en nuestra muestra nacional. En ambas técnicas quirúrgicas, la pérdida de peso máxima se produce a los 18 meses de la cirugía. Ambas técnicas siguen la misma evolución ponderal, aunque los valores del porcentaje de pérdida total de peso perdido sean inferiores en el caso de la GV a los 36 meses (29,3 ± 10 vs. 33,6 ± 10). La edad y el género son determinantes en los resultados ponderales (mejores en paciente más jóvenes para ambas técnicas y mejores en mujeres para el BPGY). Conclusiones: Los gráficos de percentiles del porcentaje de peso total perdido después de la cirugía bariátrica representan una herramienta muy útil y un avance importante en la calidad asistencial para el seguimiento ponderal del paciente

Introduction: The aim of this study is to analyze weight evolution after the main bariatric surgical techniques (Roux-en-Y gastric bypass [RYGB] and sleeve gastrectomy [SG]) performed at a representative sample of Spanish hospitals in order to develop percentile charts for the percentage of total weight loss during the first 3 years after surgery. Methods: A retrospective longitudinal cohort study was conducted based on the data provided by 9 Spanish hospitals. Weight data were analyzed both in % total weight loss and % excess weight lost corresponding to the RYGB (n = 1,887) and SG (n = 1,210). Results: RYGB continues to be the most frequently performed technique in our sample. In both surgical techniques, maximum weight loss occurred 18 months after surgery. Both techniques followed the same weight evolution, although the % total weight loss values were lower in the case of the SG after 36 months (29.3 ± 10 vs. 33.6 ± 10). Age and gender are decisive in the weight results (better in younger patients for both techniques and better in women for RYGB). Conclusions: Percentile charts of % total weight loss after bariatric surgery represent a very useful tool and an important advance in the quality of patient management

Analysis of mid-term weight loss after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy: Proposed percentile charts for total weight loss percentages to be used in daily clinical practice. / Análisis de la pérdida ponderal a medio plazo después del bypass gastroyeyunal en Y de Roux y de la gastrectomía vertical: propuesta de gráficos de percentiles del porcentaje de peso total perdido para su uso en la práctica clínica diaria.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study is to analyze weight evolution after the main bariatric surgical techniques (Roux-en-Y gastric bypass [RYGB] and sleeve gastrectomy [SG]) performed at a representative sample of Spanish hospitals in order to develop percentile charts for the percentage of total weight loss during the first 3 years after surgery. METHODS: A retrospective longitudinal cohort study was conducted based on the data provided by 9 Spanish hospitals. Weight data were analyzed both in % total weight loss and % excess weight lost corresponding to the RYGB (n=1,887) and SG (n=1,210). RESULTS: RYGB continues to be the most frequently performed technique in our sample. In both surgical techniques, maximum weight loss occurred 18 months after surgery. Both techniques followed the same weight evolution, although the % total weight loss values were lower in the case of the SG after 36 months (29.3±10 vs. 33.6±10). Age and gender are decisive in the weight results (better in younger patients for both techniques and better in women for RYGB). CONCLUSIONS: Percentile charts of % total weight loss after bariatric surgery represent a very useful tool and an important advance in the quality of patient management.

Gastrectomía vertical: globalización y sus controversias / Sleeve gastrectomy: Globalization and its controversies

No disponible

Prognostic factors of weight loss after sleeve gastrectomy: Multi centre study in Spain and Portugal. / Factores predictivos de pérdida ponderal tras la gastrectomía vertical. Estudio multicéntrico hispano-portugués.

INTRODUCTION: Sleeve gastrectomy (SG) has become a technique in its own right although a selective or global indication remains controversial. The weight loss data at 5 years are heterogeneous. The aim of the study is to identify possible prognostic factors of insufficient weight loss after SG. METHODS: A SG retrospective multicenter study of more than one year follow-up was performed. Failure is considered if EWL>50%. Univariate and multivariate study of Cox regression were performed to identify prognostic factors of failure of weight loss at 1, 2 and 3 years of follow up. RESULTS: A total of 1,565 patients treated in 29 hospitals are included. PSP per year: 70.58±24.7; 3 years 69.39±29.2; 5 years 68.46±23.1. Patients with EWL<50 (considered failure): 17.1% in the first year, 20.1% at 3 years, 20.8% at 5 years. Variables with influence on the weight loss failure in univariate analysis were: BMI>50kg/m2, age>50years, DM2, hypertension, OSA, heart disease, multiple comorbidities, distance to pylorus> 4cm, bougie>40F, treatment with antiplatelet agents. The reinforcement of the suture improved results. In multivariate study DM2 and BMI are independent factors of failure. CONCLUSION: The SG associates a satisfactory weight loss in 79% of patients in the first 5 years; however, some variables such as BMI>50, age>50, the presence of several comorbidities, more than 5cm section of the pylorus or bougie>40F can increase the risk of weight loss failure.

Factores predictivos de pérdida ponderal tras la gastrectomia vertical. Estudio multicéntrico hispano-portugués / Prognostic factors of weight loss after sleeve gastrectomy: Multicenter study in Spain and Portugal

INTRODUCCIÓN: La gastrectomía vertical (GV) se ha convertido en una técnica con entidad propia cuya indicación selectiva o global sigue siendo objeto de controversia. Los resultados ponderales a 5 años son heterogéneos. El objetivo del estudio es identificar posibles factores pronósticos de pérdida de peso insuficiente tras GV. MÉTODOS: Estudio multicéntrico retrospectivo de GV con seguimiento mayor de un año. Se considera fracaso si el PSP < 50%. Se realiza estudio univariado y multivariado de regresión de Cox para determinar los factores que influyen en el fracaso ponderal a 1, 2 y 3 años de seguimiento. RESULTADOS: Se incluye a 1.565 pacientes intervenidos en 29 hospitales. PSP al año: 70,58 ± 24,8; a los 3 años 69,39 ± 29,2; a los 5 años 68,46 ± 23,1. Pacientes con PSP <50 (considerado fracaso ponderal): 17,1% en el primer año, 20,1% a 3 años, 20,8% a 5 años. Las variables que mostraron relación con el fracaso ponderal en el estudio univariado fueron: IMC > 50 kg/m2, edad > 50 años, DM2, HTA, SAOS, cardiopatía, varias comorbilidades asociadas, distancia a píloro > 5 cm, bujía >40 F, tratamiento con antiagregantes. La sobresutura mejora los resultados. Las variables que mostraron ser factores predictivos de fracaso en el seguimiento fueron la DM2 y el IMC. CONCLUSIÓN: La GV asocia una pérdida de peso satisfactoria en el 79% de los pacientes en los primeros 5 años; sin embargo, algunas variables como el IMC > 50, la DM2, la edad > 50, la presencia de varias comorbilidades, la sección a más de 4cm del píloro o la bujía > 40 F pueden aumentar el riesgo de fracaso ponderal

INTRODUCTION: Sleeve gastrectomy (SG) has become a technique in its own right although a selective or global indication remains controversial. The weight loss data at 5 years are heterogeneous. The aim of the study is to identify possible prognostic factors of insufficient weight loss after SG. METHODS: A SG retrospective multicenter study of more than one year follow-up was performed. Failure is considered if EWL > 50%. Univariate and multivariate study of Cox regression were performed to identify prognostic factors of failure of weight loss at 1, 2 and 3 years of follow up. RESULTS: A total of 1,565 patients treated in 29 hospitals are included. PSP per year: 70.58 ± 24.7; 3 years 69.39 ± 29.2; 5 years 68.46 ± 23.1. Patients with EWL< 50 (considered failure): 17.1% in the first year, 20.1% at 3 years, 20.8% at 5 years. Variables with influence on the weight loss failure in univariate analysis were: BMI > 50 kg/m2, age > 50 years, DM2, hypertension, OSA, heart disease, multiple comorbidities, distance to pylorus> 4cm, bougie > 40F, treatment with antiplatelet agents. The reinforcement of the suture improved results. In multivariate study DM2 and BMI are independent factors of failure. CONCLUSION: The SG associates a satisfactory weight loss in 79% of patients in the first 5 years; however, some variables such as BMI > 50, age > 50, the presence of several comorbidities, more than 5 cm section of the pylorus or bougie > 40F can increase the risk of weight loss failure

Criterios de calidad en cirugía bariátrica: revisión de conjunto y recomendaciones de la Asociación Española de Cirujanos y de la Sociedad Española de Cirugía de la Obesidad / Quality criteria in bariatric surgery: Consensus review and recommendations of the Spanish Association of Surgeons and the Spanish Society of Bariatric Surgery

La cirugía bariátrica ha demostrado ser muy eficaz en el control de la obesidad y el síndrome metabólico. Sus resultados no solo se expresan en términos de pérdida de peso, sino también en la resolución de comorbilidades, mejoría de la calidad de vida y de las complicaciones derivadas. Los diferentes parámetros utilizados para medir estos resultados requieren de una uniformidad y de unos patrones de referencia. Por ello, es fundamental establecer cuáles son los indicadores y los criterios de calidad que definen las «buenas prácticas» en cirugía bariátrica. En este sentido, la Sección de Obesidad de la Asociación Española de Cirujanos (AEC), en colaboración con la Sociedad Española de Cirugía de la Obesidad (SECO), se plantea como objetivo identificar los puntos clave que definen la calidad en este tipo de cirugía. Para ello se describen los principales indicadores basados en la literatura publicada, así como los criterios de remisión de las principales comorbilidades según las evidencias encontradas y sus grados de recomendación

Bariatric surgery has proven to be highly effective in controlling obesity and metabolic syndrome; the results of this surgery are not only expressed in terms of weight loss, but also in terms of resolution of comorbidities, improved quality of life and complications. The different parameters used to measure these outcomes require uniformity and reference patterns. Therefore, it is essential to identify those indicators and quality criteria that are helpful in defining the «best practice» principles in bariatric surgery. In this regard, the Section of Obesity of the Spanish Association of Surgeons, in collaboration with the Spanish Society for Bariatric Surgery (SECO), present as an objective to identify the key points that define «quality» in this type of surgery. We describe the main indicators based on the published literature as well as the criteria for referral of the main comorbidities according to the evidence found and grades of recommendation

Weight Loss Analysis According to Different Formulas after Sleeve Gastrectomy With or Without Antral Preservation: a Randomised Study.

BACKGROUND: The measurement of weight loss after bariatric surgery is under constant review in order to obtain the ideal standard for reporting weight loss. Several formulas have been proposed for this purpose. Our goal is to analyse weight loss after sleeve gastrectomy, with or without antrum preservation through different measurement formulas. METHODS: A prospective randomised study of 60 patients (30 patients with initial section at 3 cm from pylorus and 30 patients at 8 cm from the pylorus). We calculate the following variables at 3, 6 and 12 months from surgery: BMI, excess weight loss (%EWL), percentage of excess of BMI loss (%PEBMIL), expected BMI, % PEBMIL corrected by EBMI and percentage of total weight loss (%TWL). RESULTS: Weight evolution is similar in both groups, reaching a mean BMI of 33.62 ± 4.35 and 34.48 ± 4.23 kg/m2 respectively 12 months after surgery, closer to expected BMI. TWL follows the same trend, with losses exceeding 30%, although 3 cm group is above the tables of percentiles made with our series. Regarding PEBMIL, the 3 cm group reaches 67.8% classified as excellent, while 8 cm group reaches 62.8% classified as a good result. EWL situates the best results for 3 cm group. CONCLUSIONS: Group 3 cm obtained a lower percentage of suboptimal results using EWL. %TWL places the 3 cm group in higher percentile than 8 cm group. Through EBMI, both groups are equally effective. It is necessary to have standardised dynamic tables for each surgical technique, becoming essential elements to measure weight loss after surgery.

Quality criteria in bariatric surgery: Consensus review and recommendations of the Spanish Association of Surgeons and the Spanish Society of Bariatric Surgery. / Criterios de calidad en cirugía bariátrica: revisión de conjunto y recomendaciones de la Asociación Española de Cirujanos y de la Sociedad Española de Cirugía de la Obesidad.

Bariatric surgery has proven to be highly effective in controlling obesity and metabolic syndrome; the results of this surgery are not only expressed in terms of weight loss, but also in terms of resolution of comorbidities, improved quality of life and complications. The different parameters used to measure these outcomes require uniformity and reference patterns. Therefore, it is essential to identify those indicators and quality criteria that are helpful in defining the «best practice¼ principles in bariatric surgery. In this regard, the Section of Obesity of the Spanish Association of Surgeons, in collaboration with the Spanish Society for Bariatric Surgery (SECO), present as an objective to identify the key points that define «quality¼ in this type of surgery. We describe the main indicators based on the published literature as well as the criteria for referral of the main comorbidities according to the evidence found and grades of recommendation.

Resección laparoscópica de un tumor virilizante suprarrenal derecho / Laparoscopic approach in an adrenal right virilizing tumour

No disponible

Usefulness of Baltasar's expected body mass index as an indicator of bariatric weight loss surgery.

INTRODUCTION: Determining the best indicator to report weight loss takes on special relevance following bariatric surgery. Our objective is to apply a method proposed by Baltasar et al. to express weight loss results following bariatric surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Anthropometric data were collected from 265 patients who had undergone Sleeve gastrectomy (SG, n = 172) and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGBP, n = 93) with a 2-year follow-up period. Initial BMI was calculated as well as BMI 2 years after, percentage of excess BMI loss (PEBMIL), expected BMI (EBMI), and corrected PEBMIL. RESULTS: In SG group, average BMI 2 years after surgery fell within a 95 % CI of expected BMI, with an average BMI of 31.58 ± 4.05 kg/m2 in 35-45 BMI group, an average BMI of 33.62 ± 4.96 kg/m2 in 45-55 BMI group, and an average BMI of 37.40 ± 5.93 kg/m2 in 55-65 BMI group. In RYGBP group, average BMI 2 years after the surgery was below than average expected BMI (28.76 ± 3.20 kg/m2 in 35-45 BMI group and 29.71 ± 3.30 kg/m2 in 45-55 BMI group). Results are considered excellent for the group with an initial BMI of above 45 kg/m2. CONCLUSIONS: EBMI is a good weight loss indicator, mainly when 95 % CI is taken into account. EBMI is consistent with the results obtained 2 years after surgery in our patients who underwent SG and RYGBP. Corrected PEBMIL is a good indicator for expressing the percentage of BMI loss and offers more realistic values than conventional formula with a cut-off point of 25 points.

Tumor miofibroblástico inflamatorio gástrico como rara causa de obstrucción de la vía biliar / Gastric inflammatory myofibroblastic tumour as a rare cause of biliary duct obstruction

No disponible